Busy Month for Obama Campaign with Fundraisers in Switzerland, Sweden, Paris and Communist China


Um, has the campaign staff of a US president ever done this before ?? This from the guy that wanted to suppress the 1st amendment to keep associations of people (corporations) from exercising the free speech rights to influence politics ?

Brad Pitt’s Mom in Fear after Slamming Obama and Citing Opposition to Marriage Redefinition


I commented on this article about the recent dust-up where Brad Bitt’s mom sent-in some political commentary to a newspaper and is now being threatened, intimidated, etc. for it… She wrote the following:

“I think any Christian should spend much time in prayer before refusing to vote for a family man with high morals, business experience, who is against abortion and shares Christian conviction concerning homosexuality just because he is a Mormon.”

“Any Christian who does not vote or writes in a name is casting a vote for Romney’s opponent, Barack Hussein Obama – a man who sat in Jeremiah Wright’s church for years, did not hold a public ceremony to mark the National Day of Prayer and is a liberal who supports the killing of unborn babies and same-sex marriage.”

I wrote, “The Gay Gestapo and their Far Left Homophile allies have to make examples of opponents that are famous figures or relatives that have a disproportional voice over the rest of the population. That’s why even someone like Carrie Prajean had to be destroyed in the public arena when she was asked the marriage question by that flaming “fairy” Perez Hilton who then later took to his blog and posted a picture of her with a penis as a microphone. It sends a loud and clear message to anyone that if you are in a public position in media/entertainment or whatever, if you have a chance to attempt to sway public opinion by whatever fame that you might have, be prepared for war: threats, defamation, personal destruction, etc. This is partially how the queer movement has advanced so far, by intimidating enough opponents into silence and letting the rest of us see what happens to those that do speak out, etc.”

“Queer” Student Who Claimed Harassment Faked Hate Notes


The tactics of the Left exposed, this, much like that university teacher writing racist comments on her car and other places, then playing the victim of a hate crime to galvanize public opinion around her and for the cause, etc.  This disgusting student now faces 8 felony counts of fabricating evidence, she is someone that chose to deceive/dupe the public into supporting the “cause” and waste police, university time and resources to do so!! Hopefully she is prosecuted to the FULLEST extent of the law! It sucks that the media reporter forwards the comments of the idiots in that video, “We’re still proud how we came together!” Yeah, under a BIG FAT LIE which was the whole point. You were manipulated precisely to achieve just that which has been the standard operating procedure of leftist cultural radicals since the 60’s (deceptive public manipulation) when this same-gender love activist movement was born/organized, etc. The reporting was all toned-down, nobody told it like it really was or deserved to be told – these tactical stunts need to be put in their historical contexts.

Using this manipulative, disgusting tactic, she was able to organize rallies at her university to raise “awareness” of “same-gender bender love” and the difficulties/issues it faces in society calling upon you bigots to change your ways and join the cause!! Yeaaaaaaaaaarrgh!!!! She employed a classic tactic of negative association by creating an invisible “anti-gay” boogeyman that was supposedly stalking her at her dorm or whatever. Her “opponents” (those who want the definition of marriage left alone, of course) weren’t extreme enough for her so she had to present an extremist caricature of an a-hole that sneaks around at night and drops threatening letters to same-gender couples. Thankfully, the clown that she is, she didn’t think what the consequences would be of reporting it to the police, who did not even tell her that they put cameras up… Bottomline, thank goodness she didn’t get away with this!

Here is a part of her speech:

“I stand here in front of you today, speaking to the person responsible for this… And all I have to say is I’m not gonna be run out of my home and I will not be intimidated by hate!”

Pffffffffft. What an jackass! She milked all possible sympathy and support that she could out of an “enemy” of her own creation, smearing/slandering and intimidating other people in the process (which WAS the point as well, tactically!) who hold traditional negative attitudes on same-gender coupling/relationships! Rot in jail, you disturbed jerk!

Hatchet Man: The Rise of David Axelrod


Awesome article on dealing with an uncensored background (a REAL background check, not a water-downed version the rest of the media gives you to bury the guy’s radicalism!) of David Axelrod, Barack “NOT-THAT-HUSSEIN” Osama-Obama-Yomama’s “Karl Rove”, the brains behind the scenes that got him elected!! This commie freak, along with Obama, are among the most radical forces in our country. Never have such radicals on the far-left fringe have been able to accomplish so much! The association with Soviets/Communists is all over the place. Anyway, it’s a LONG article and I can’t believe it, but I read the whole thing. Damn good read!

John Roberts a Supreme Failure…an Obamination!

I remember how awesome John Roberts handled himself in the confirmation hearings and I would still recommend watching them as they were quite informative, most especially on how to handle ultrapartisan hack democrats, but with Roberts apparently flipping his vote while Kennedy — the usual swing voter on the court — actually voted to FULLY overturn the Affordable Health Care Act (AKA this Obamacare monstrosity), nobody could’ve predicted this bizarre and disastrous outcome! Nobody saw this one coming!! Most were predicting that at least the mandate would be thrown out, that is the act forcing you to go out and buy something (insurance) just for being alive – this is not a power the federal government is supposed to have (the US Constitution provides for a limited federal government, with limited types of taxes that it can levy even).

We knew what the political hacks masquerading as judges were going to do, like the fringe ACLU hag, Baby Ruth Vader Ginsburg, the 2 Obammunist hacks that Obama appointed (Elena Kagan, Sonya Sotomayor) and the other rogue judicial appointee, Stephen Breyer. But for John Roberts to have joined the 4 rogue justices in upholding this debacle as a tax which will forever change the relationship between the federal government and the citizen (the Fed is as powerful as your State government, e.g. the State forcing you to buy car insurance) shows he may wind up being another Souter. Ann Coulter may have got it right back in ’05 when she referred to him as a “Souter in Roberts’ Clothing…”

What an unbelievable, horrifying disaster/debacle! And Anthony Kennedy was willing to save the day by completely declaring the law unconstitutional, but Roberts wanted to be a hero to the democrats for whatever reasons – if it’s true that he allowed political pressure to influence his decision at the last minute, then he is no better than the freaks like Ginsburg (really, she’s so loathsome, the most radical, far-left cultural-marxist ideologue to sit on the court, just doesn’t belong there, period)! You’re supposed to fight for the Constitution, NOT for the radical ideology of power-hungry democrats who look upon it as outdated and too-limiting when they’re not pretending to support it! This disgusting president has been overtly intimidating this court (see: the Citizens United case), just like FDR did decades ago, (threatening it with “court-packing”) and that’s exactly the kind of thing it’s supposed to be protected from so that it can make intellectually HONEST decisions, not pander to hostile mobs like the Occupiers or the NY Times (YEAH, they ARE a political mob of far left news-reporting hacks!)! Repeat, this is a DISASTER and A LOT was a stake here! A LOT! Shame on you, Roberts! Shame on you!!!!

I can’t wait for this horrifying presidency to be over! It really has been an Obamination! This cokehead neo-Marxist president has done so much irreversible damage to the country along with those 2 years when democrats had FULL control of the House and Senate with filibuster-proof majorities… He’s the most radical, partisan hack to be elected president in the history of the country, raised and influenced by radical Marxists/Socialists/Communists, in other words, the far-left freakshow! Two of his communist friends were domestic terrorists (of the Weather Underground group) that bombed the country! He would not have won were it not for all the corrupt democrat hacks in the media covering for him, ridiculously presenting him as a centrist, a “post-partisan” unifier, etc and using Bush’s later unpopularity… Who the fuck were they kidding? What a nightmare, please let it end come next election!

In summarizing Obamacare:

Let me get this straight …… We’re going to be “gifted” with a health care plan we are forced to purchase and fined if we don’t, which purportedly covers at least ten million more people, without adding a single new doctor, but provides for 16,000 new IRS agents, written by a committee whose chairman says he doesn’t understand it, passed by a Congress that didn’t read it but exempted themselves from it, and signed by a President who smokes (and was once a cokehead), with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn’t pay his taxes, for which we’ll be taxed for four years before any benefits take effect, by a government which has already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare, all to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that’s broke!!!!!

But it’s all gonna work out cause 57 States Obama (dumb as a box of rocks when without a teleprompter) knows what the fuck he’s doing, right ??

Good/Decent article(s):

  1. NAPOLITANO: Roberts unleashes vast federal power – (Basis for high court ruling not found in the Constitution)
  2. I Am Barack Obama’s Worst Nightmare – DAMN RIGHT! Quote: “I am a thinking, educated, intelligent, independent voter. … But the most significant thing that makes Barack Obama view me as his worst nightmare is simply this: I tell the truth about him. I don’t need to lie. I don’t need to “create” a narrative. What he has done all by himself is so appalling that any need for embellishment is stillborn.”
  3. The Constitutionality of the ObamaCare Tax
  4. If We Took the Constitution Seriously, Obama Would Be Impeached
  5. The Chief Justice Done Good – Although I find this notion questionable, but worth a look.
  6. Why I Walked Out on John Roberts – “The Monday-morning quarterbacking after the ObamaCare decision is that Roberts sought to preserve the reputation of the Court from partisan attacks by the left, and that he tried to please both the left and the right by rejecting the “commerce clause” argument but still upholding the legislation. From what I saw of him, I think that’s probably true. But Roberts’s decision saddled the nation with an execrable 2,700-page law that gives government control over nearly 20% of the economy, allows unlimited future taxation to control our behavior, and makes our dietary practices, sexual practices, and mental health the concern of federal bureaucrats in Washington. His decision may have pleased the country-club moderates, but I suspect that James Madison is rolling in his grave.”
  7. A Vast New Taxing Power – The last paragraph is nail on the head: “It is not our job,” the Chief Justice writes, “to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.” But the Court’s most important role is to protect liberty when the political branches exceed the Constitution’s bounds, not to bless their excesses in the interests of political or personal expediency or both. On one of the most consequential cases he will ever hear, Chief Justice Roberts failed this most basic responsibility.
  8. John Roberts’ Travesty, Point by Point

    Tax Mandate

Megaupload Shutdown for Piracy! It has a special history with me…

Upon clicking a megaupload.com link today, much to a sad ironic sense of surprise, I saw that image to the right appear! The sad irony is because back on January 29, 2007, which stands as a day of infamy in my life, a disgusting, miserable, angry, atheist piece of shit by the alias of Pruvmerong leaked my Felghana patch by, a) pasting the private link to it that I had given him, and b) uploading a copy of the patch to Megaupload and also pasting a link to that, and today, after almost 5 years I find that megaupload was shutdown! …….. Sad, amusing, thoughts of, “Wish I could be bringing Pruvmerong to justice like this! Oh, how I so wish he was one of the warez criminals that were indicted…”, etc.

But yeah, how about that, eh? 1/29/2007 was the day that I was first introduced to megaupload and sites like it and my life changed quite a bit ever since having run into this most vile, disgusting, repugnant individual that still walks the planet earth… That’s the bad side of Ys, ladies and gentlemen, it attracts the 99%! With 99% freeloaders and videogame thieves (read: ungrateful parasites that feed off of the work of others), other criminal malcontent behavior was always a possibility, but I certainly didn’t plan for dealing with it properly at the time, that’s for damn sure and I paid a heavy price for it indeed! So this shutdown does give me some sense of justice, in some way. And yet, I use file sharing/pirating sites like this (mediafire) to save bandwidth and host some patches still, so it’s not like I could condemn them all to hell in general, but THIS one, well, it just happened to have been used by the wrong warez criminal at the wrong time and as a result, it earned my hate and a minor sense of satisfaction that it will never again be able to be used to do to someone else what it did to me… And judging by the fact that the US FBI seized the domain and shut the thing down, it would appear that there were far worse warez criminals than Pruvmerong that were using it!

ABC News Channel is approved by 9/11 terrorists! Eheh!


This news article was cracking me up today! It was the first news link in my yahoo mail account when I logged in. Basically, Al-Qaida’s top spokesman commented on our media outlets and thanks to him, we now know that “ABC News” is essentially Al-Qaida-approved!!! Hahah! That’s right, the terrorist group that attacked us on 9/11 says the following: “ABC channel is all right; actually it could be one of the best channels, as far as we are concerned.” – One of the best channels as far as they’re concerned, meaning for their “purposes…” Hahaha!

I dunno if the author of this article is trying to smear Fox News, because that is the quote that he picked out of this report to title his article with. There are many interpretations, such as, is it bad to be hated or considered an enemy by a terrorist group hell-bent on our destruction? Or, are we supposed to agree with Al-Qaida when they tell us that Fox News isn’t neutral or “useful enough” ?? Is the joke supposed to be about the media outlets that the terrorists approve/like or is it supposed to be that, “See, see, I told ya, I told ya, even Al-Qaida doesn’t think Fox News is fair and balanced!!!” Anyhow, we know how much the American Left and democrats hate Fox News, and now we know that they have an ally in their hate, Al-Qaida!! It’s all about finding common ground with our worst enemies, you know?? Hahah!

Strassel: The President Has a List (Osbama intimidating donors to Mitt Romney’s campaign.)

Our beloved Prezident Barack “The Bullshevik” Osama-Obama-Yomama letting his enemies know whazzzup! 😉

Try this thought experiment: You decide to donate money to Mitt Romney. You want change in the Oval Office, so you engage in your democratic right to send a check.

Several days later, President Barack Obama, the most powerful man on the planet, singles you out by name. His campaign brands you a Romney donor, shames you for “betting against America,” and accuses you of having a “less-than-reputable” record. The message from the man who controls the Justice Department (which can indict you), the SEC (which can fine you), and the IRS (which can audit you), is clear: You made a mistake donating that money.

Are you worried?

Richard Nixon’s “enemies list” appalled the country for the simple reason that presidents hold a unique trust. Unlike senators or congressmen, presidents alone represent all Americans. Their powers—to jail, to fine, to bankrupt—are also so vast as to require restraint. Any president who targets a private citizen for his politics is de facto engaged in government intimidation and threats. This is why presidents since Nixon have carefully avoided the practice.

Save Mr. Obama, who acknowledges no rules. This past week, one of his campaign websites posted an item entitled “Behind the curtain: A brief history of Romney’s donors.” In the post, the Obama campaign named and shamed eight private citizens who had donated to his opponent. Describing the givers as all having “less-than-reputable records,” the post went on to make the extraordinary accusations that “quite a few” have also been “on the wrong side of the law” and profiting at “the expense of so many Americans.”

These are people like Paul Schorr and Sam and Jeffrey Fox, investors who the site outed for the crime of having “outsourced” jobs. T. Martin Fiorentino is scored for his work for a firm that forecloses on homes. Louis Bacon (a hedge-fund manager), Kent Burton (a “lobbyist”) and Thomas O’Malley (an energy CEO) stand accused of profiting from oil. Frank VanderSloot, the CEO of a home-products firm, is slimed as a “bitter foe of the gay rights movement.”

These are wealthy individuals, to be sure, but private citizens nonetheless. Not one holds elected office. Not one is a criminal. Not one has the barest fraction of the position or the power of the U.S. leader who is publicly assaulting them.

“We don’t tolerate presidents or people of high power to do these things,” says Theodore Olson, the former U.S. solicitor general. “When you have the power of the presidency—the power of the IRS, the INS, the Justice Department, the DEA, the SEC—what you have effectively done is put these guys’ names up on ‘Wanted’ posters in government offices.” Mr. Olson knows these tactics, having demanded that the 44th president cease publicly targeting Charles and David Koch of Koch Industries, which he represents. He’s been ignored.

The real crime of the men, as the website tacitly acknowledges, is that they have given money to Mr. Romney. This fundraiser of a president has shown an acute appreciation for the power of money to win elections, and a cutthroat approach to intimidating those who might give to his opponents.

He’s targeted insurers, oil firms and Wall Street—letting it be known that those who oppose his policies might face political or legislative retribution. He lectured the Supreme Court for giving companies more free speech and (falsely) accused the Chamber of Commerce of using foreign money to bankroll U.S. elections. The White House even ginned up an executive order (yet to be released) to require companies to list political donations as a condition of bidding for government contracts. Companies could bid but lose out for donating to Republicans. Or they could quit donating to the GOP—Mr. Obama’s real aim.

The White House has couched its attacks in the language of “disclosure” and the argument that corporations should not have the same speech rights as individuals. But now, says Rory Cooper of the Heritage Foundation, “he’s doing the same at the individual level, for anyone who opposes his policies.” Any giver, at any level, risks reprisal from the president of the United States.

It’s getting worse because the money game is not going as Team Obama wants. Super PACs are helping the GOP to level the playing field against Democratic super-spenders. Prominent financial players are backing Mr. Romney. The White House’s new strategy is thus to delegitimize Mr. Romney (by attacking his donors) as it seeks to frighten others out of giving.

The Obama campaign has justified any action on the grounds that it has a right to “hold the eventual Republican nominee accountable,” but this is a dodge. Politics is rough, but a president has obligations that transcend those of a candidate. He swore an oath to protect and defend a Constitution that gives every American the right to partake in democracy, free of fear of government intimidation or disfavored treatment. If Mr. Obama isn’t going to act like a president, he bolsters the argument that he doesn’t deserve to be one.

Climategate – “The great global warming collapse”


The eco/enviro-Marxists (AKA ‘watermelons’ = enviro-green on the outside, communist red on the inside) have suffered a great defeat in their attempts to deceive and scare-monger the world into “changing its ways” by claiming that “global warming” is anthropogenic, the result of human activity that causes the release of carbon dioxide, methane, and a few other “greenhouse gases”, etc. Since they’re Marxist malcontents at heart, their prescription for a solution is always the same: bigger, badder government to control economic activity, which means more regulations and taxes.

The hoax/scam of anthropogenic global warming has raked in billions of dollars in taxes, grants, carbon credit/trade utter nonsense, etc. so when the climategate scandal hit, you knew these freaks would dig in and downplay its significance, but I don’t think they’re gonna get away with it. Not this time. Anyway, I’ve linked and pasted a good article about this below.

The great global warming collapse

“As the science scandals keep coming, the air has gone out of the climate-change movement”

In 2007, the most comprehensive report to date on global warming, issued by the respected United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, made a shocking claim: The Himalayan glaciers could melt away as soon as 2035.

These glaciers provide the headwaters for Asia’s nine largest rivers and lifelines for the more than one billion people who live downstream. Melting ice and snow would create mass flooding, followed by mass drought. The glacier story was reported around the world. Last December, a spokesman for the World Wildlife Fund, an environmental pressure group, warned, “The deal reached at Copenhagen will have huge ramifications for the lives of hundreds of millions of people who are already highly vulnerable due to widespread poverty.” To dramatize their country’s plight, Nepal’s top politicians strapped on oxygen tanks and held a cabinet meeting on Mount Everest.

But the claim was rubbish, and the world’s top glaciologists knew it. It was based not on rigorously peer-reviewed science but on an anecdotal report by the WWF itself. When its background came to light on the eve of Copenhagen, Rajendra Pachauri, the head of the IPCC, shrugged it off. But now, even leading scientists and environmental groups admit the IPCC is facing a crisis of credibility that makes the Climategate affair look like small change.

“The global warming movement as we have known it is dead,” the brilliant analyst Walter Russell Mead says in his blog on The American Interest. It was done in by a combination of bad science and bad politics.

The impetus for the Copenhagen conference was that the science makes it imperative for us to act. But even if that were true – and even if we knew what to do – a global deal was never in the cards. As Mr. Mead writes, “The global warming movement proposed a complex set of international agreements involving vast transfers of funds, intrusive regulations in national economies, and substantial changes to the domestic political economies of most countries on the planet.” Copenhagen was never going to produce a breakthrough. It was a dead end.

And now, the science scandals just keep on coming. First there was the vast cache of e-mails leaked from the University of East Anglia, home of a crucial research unit responsible for collecting temperature data. Although not fatal to the science, they revealed a snakepit of scheming to keep contradictory research from being published, make imperfect data look better, and withhold information from unfriendly third parties. If science is supposed to be open and transparent, these guys acted as if they had a lot to hide.

Despite widespread efforts to play down the Climategate e-mails, they were very damaging. An investigation by the British newspaper The Guardian – among the most aggressive advocates for action on climate change – has found that a series of measurements from Chinese weather stations were seriously flawed, and that documents relating to them could not be produced.

Meantime, the IPCC – the body widely regarded, until now, as the ultimate authority on climate science – is looking worse and worse. After it was forced to retract its claim about melting glaciers, Mr. Pachauri dismissed the error as a one-off. But other IPCC claims have turned out to be just as groundless.

For example, it warned that large tracts of the Amazon rain forest might be wiped out by global warming because they are extremely susceptible to even modest decreases in rainfall. The sole source for that claim, reports The Sunday Times of London, was a magazine article written by a pair of climate activists, one of whom worked for the WWF. One scientist contacted by the Times, a specialist in tropical forest ecology, called the article “a mess.”

Worse still, the Times has discovered that Mr. Pachauri’s own Energy and Resources Unit, based in New Delhi, has collected millions in grants to study the effects of glacial melting – all on the strength of that bogus glacier claim, which happens to have been endorsed by the same scientist who now runs the unit that got the money. Even so, the IPCC chief is hanging tough. He insists the attacks on him are being orchestrated by companies facing lower profits.

Until now, anyone who questioned the credibility of the IPCC was labelled as a climate skeptic, or worse. But many climate scientists now sense a sinking ship, and they’re bailing out. Among them is Andrew Weaver, a climatologist at the University of Victoria who acknowledges that the climate body has crossed the line into advocacy. Even Britain’s Greenpeace has called for Mr. Pachauri’s resignation. India says it will establish its own body to monitor the effects of global warming because it “cannot rely” on the IPCC.

None of this is to say that global warming isn’t real, or that human activity doesn’t play a role, or that the IPCC is entirely wrong, or that measures to curb greenhouse-gas emissions aren’t valid. But the strategy pursued by activists (including scientists who have crossed the line into advocacy) has turned out to be fatally flawed.

By exaggerating the certainties, papering over the gaps, demonizing the skeptics and peddling tales of imminent catastrophe, they’ve discredited the entire climate-change movement. The political damage will be severe. As Mr. Mead succinctly puts it: “Skeptics up, Obama down, cap-and-trade dead.” That also goes for Canada, whose climate policies are inevitably tied to those of the United States.

“I don’t think it’s healthy to dismiss proper skepticism,” says John Beddington, the chief scientific adviser to the British government. He is a staunch believer in man-made climate change, but he also points out the complexity of climate science. “Science grows and improves in the light of criticism. There is a fundamental uncertainty about climate change prediction that can’t be changed.” In his view, it’s time to stop circling the wagons and throw open the doors. How much the public will keep caring is another matter.

Bullshevik Barack “NOT-THAT-HUSSEIN” Osbama as “The Joker”


The neo-Marxist Left and other assorted, perpetually malcontent douchebags of the American Left, are upset that somebody dared to depict this miserable failure of a president (THAT’S RIGHT, I SAID IT! HE’S A MISERABLE FAILURE!) as The Joker, the Batman villain from the recent movie The Dark Knight. All I have to say is HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Eh, on second thought, I DO have more to say… It’s soooo damn close to reality… I mean for one thing, this man doesn’t have very many normal friends; most seem to be societal malcontents, especially the two communist-terrorists, Billy “the bombthrower” Ayers and his wife Bernadine whose terror group was responsible for BOMBING the Pentagon, the Capitol, etc. I’ve been saying and thinking it for a long time: he’s got the same chip on his shoulders as all the radicals that he hung out with, it’s just that he hid it very well and with a lapdog media on his side, he was able to roll right into the WhiteHouse… These friends of his are and always were a roadmap towards understanding who he is and what’s lurking inside that head of his, something we’re learning more and more as his horrifying presidency unfolds!

Now, how upset do you think the little darlings were when their comrades of Vanity Fair did the same fucking thing to the previous president? Scroll down to the second picture. I bet they had a real good laugh at that Bush picture, but I also bet that NOW the joke isn’t funny anymore, right? You can hear them now: This is an OUTRAGE, mean-spirited, dangerous, you rabid right-wingers need to stop that shit! No, we’re not gonna stop that shit; what we’re gonna do is come out in droves and vote as if our very lives depended on it in the 2010 elections to save the fucking country from this nightmare! Yesss, nightmare! There is a very good chance republicans can win back the House of Representatives from the freaks, so there is light at the end of the tunnel, but it’s ~15 months away… 🙁




Which president do you think deserves this depiction more, Barack or Bush ? Decide.

Copyright © 1996-2010 Plight of the Fan Translator. All rights reserved.
Jarrah theme by Templates Next | Powered by WordPress